> ## Content Index > Fetch the complete content index at: https://playwright.petra-tabarelli.com/llms.txt > Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further. # Changing Spaces: Theatre and Private Music-Making in Long-Regency England - URL: https://playwright.petra-tabarelli.com/theatre-music-long-regency-england/ - Published: 2026-09-18T09:48:00.000Z - Updated: 2026-09-22T17:53:26.000Z - Description: This paper examines how social change affected the English music scene, primarily in London as its flourishing centre, between 1760 and 1840. - Author: Petra Tabarelli - Tags: History --- I wrote this term paper during the summer semester of 2011 as part of the seminar ‘Fairest Isle, all isles excelling – English culture, society and ways of life 1760–1840’ taught by Prof. Dr Josef Johannes Schmid (History, University of Mainz). It is a translation from German and was written for a non-British audience. Some interpretations and terminology reflect the scholarship I was working with at the time. The full paper is available here for anyone who would like to read the longer historical version: [Music in England, 1760-1840 by Petra TabarelliMusic in England, 1760-1840 by Petra Tabarelli.pdf197 KBdownload-circle](https://playwright.petra-tabarelli.com/content/files/2026/09/Music-in-England--1760-1840-by-Petra-Tabarelli.pdf "Download") List of Content: Introduction - London’s Musical Culture (The London Theatres, The Musicians and their Income, The Lenten Oratorios) - Music in Public Spaces (The Aristocracy: Seeing and Being Seen, The Change: The Subscription, The Transformation: The Opera Buffa) - Music in the Private Sphere (In the Private Salon, The Glee Clubs & Masonic Lodges) - Sacred Music (Music in cathedrals and parish churches, Embassy Chapels) - Conclusion - Bibliography --- ## Introduction Around 1800, London's vibrant concert life surpassed that of Paris and Vienna. Operas and other musical entertainments were staged regularly in the many theatres, and in the pleasure gardens – particularly Vauxhall and Ranelagh – in summer. During Lent, oratorios were also performed. Music lovers could choose between competing concert series, Italian opera, and artful music in plays, masked plays, and pantomime. This rich musical culture also impacted small English towns. Most had an amateur music society that regularly held orchestral concerts and staged musical performances in theatres, as well as taking part in opera productions. There was also usually a brass band belonging to the local vigilante group, providing an additional musical ensemble. In London, there were three royal theatres authorised to stage dramatic performances, i.e. operas, under the Licensing Act of 1737\. They were named after the streets on which they were situated: Drury Lane, Covent Garden, and the King's Theatre on Haymarket, the latter of which was owned by the King. Later, the Little Theatre on Haymarket was added. Although ballets and divertissements were also performed here, they were only presented as afterpieces following an opera or play. Following several fires in London theatres at the end of the 18th and beginning of the 19th centuries, rendering them unusable, the Pantheon was granted a temporary licence to stage operas. Until the Theatre Regulation Act of 1843, all other theatres and pleasure gardens were only permitted to stage genres such as melodramas, burlesques, ballets and pantomimes. Between October and June, opera performances were held two to three times a week in the aforementioned theatres. Rehearsals for the evening performance began at 10 am for the musicians. Performances themselves began at various times between 5 pm and 7 pm, lasting several hours and sometimes continuing until midnight. Doors opened one hour before the performance began. Half an hour before the performance began, the orchestra would start entertaining the audience with music. In the 18th and early 19th centuries, composers were not freelance artists, but were employed by a noble or ecclesiastical court, or by a theatre. Alternatively, they received financial support from patrons, but this made them dependent on their musical preferences, whims and the prevailing musical fashions. Although most composers came from the middle classes, when in the service of aristocratic families, they were merely regarded as part of the higher domestic staff. While musicians' incomes were higher than those of manual labourers, they were significantly lower than those of composers, librettists, watchmakers or jewellers, whose crafts were considered more valuable. Samuel Wesley remarked on the relatively low pay: 'I have every day more and more cause to curse the day that ever my poor, good father suffered music to be my profession \[...\] The whole is a degrading business for any man of spirit or ability.' Ultimately, a composer’s salary depended on their reputation and the demand for their work. The Society for the Support of Musicians in Distress (founded as the Society for the Support of Musicians in Need as early as 1738) was transformed into the Royal Society of Musicians by George III through a charter in 1789\. However, this did not ultimately alter musicians’ salaries; in fact, the pay gap steadily widened until 1820, and could change rapidly for any given musician depending on supply and demand. Composers' remuneration also fluctuated considerably as it was subject to the same market-regulating factors. ## Music in Theatres ### The Aristocracy: Seeing and Being Seen In the 18th century, operas and oratorios reflected the distinct social classes of the time. Within aristocratic society, they served as a subtle barometer of power relations and social structures. In the 1780s, this high-society circle was an exclusive group. The theatres were small and intimate enough to serve as effective meeting places. 'To see and be seen' was the motto. As well as providing cultural enrichment, attending the opera was an opportunity to cultivate and expand one’s social connections. The limited size of the auditorium and the manageable number of boxes facilitated this. People could easily observe one another. Members of high society knew each other well enough to attribute social significance to even minor changes in others' behaviour. Who was talking to whom? Were there signs that a personal relationship was developing? Could people even detect a cooling of existing relationships? Who stood out because of their expensive new clothes, and who was clearly unable to afford any? New visitors immediately stood out within the close-knit group. The event was also an opportunity to signal political connections, gather information and track changes and news within the upper class's social network. The social aspect was clearly at the forefront of opera, with the performance and music providing the setting for gatherings. The 18th-century opera-going public was 'event-oriented' (Hall-Witt) and considered themselves to be part of the entire spectacle. The singers performed their arias and vocal embellishments, to which the audience responded with cheers or boos. The audience was interested in the music, not the composers or singers. Only the names of well-known singers were printed. Before the performance began and during the intervals, the audience consulted the opera's libretto. These contained the texts of the operas with English translations, but not the names of the composer or singers. They cost 1s 6d in the 1780s and 2s from 1805 to the 1820s. The singers' reputations rose and fell with the audience's reaction. Their musical performance was not the only thing that was judged; their choice of songs and the variety in their delivery were also considered. Singers were expected not only to shine vocally, but also to perform their songs differently each time. Composers and singers achieved this required novelty by constantly reworking existing musical material. Opera singers would even incorporate arias from other operas or pasticcios to perform a particular song from a different work and thrill the audience. As opera libretti were not considered sacred or protected, anyone could alter another artist’s musical composition and perform it in its altered form without permission – a practice that was exploited unashamedly and extensively. To reduce the length of performances, three-act operas were often condensed into two acts. The impresario's art lay not only in maintaining a permanent cast of talented performers, but also in tailoring the programme for each performance to suit the audience's preferences. Planned performances were announced one or, at most, two days in advance: in the evening during the performance, between the main play and the afterpiece, and the following morning in the press. One or two newspapers had the privilege of publishing the programme and paid the theatres for this right. Social status could be discerned not only from visitors' clothing, but also from their customary seats in the theatre auditorium. Those who could not afford to pay half a guinea, along with the less well-off guests in simpler attire, took their seats in the gallery. Meanwhile, wealthy citizens and the lower nobility sat in the boxes and stalls of the front tiers. High courtesans sat in the upper tiers. They used the performance to draw attention to themselves and generate interest. The stalls were occupied by a mix of nobility, upper-class and middle-class people, as well as journalists and artists – the latter two groups gained admission via the free list. ### The Change: The Subscription Members of the nobility secured their seats by subscribing. Their names were entered into the subscription lists on display and they paid the fee for opera performances for an entire season in advance. This guaranteed subscribers the same seat and provided the impresario with financial security. However, not everyone could afford the price, which is not specified in the literature, but was certainly high, even for members of the nobility. Many of them had previously been invited to subscribe by their patrons. Until the end of the 18th century, subscribers preferred box seats. This largely unchanged, consistent circle of seat holders was a fundamental feature of opera subscription culture. As subscribers were almost always the same people year on year, new visitors immediately stood out and were closely observed. Equally noteworthy were absent subscribers and the presumed reason for their absence. Such observations served as indicators of financial changes within families and provided insight into social ascent or decline. Around a quarter of all English aristocrats were subscribers to one of the London opera houses. In effect, the opera house functioned as a semi-private club, with subscribers constituting the theatre’s main source of income. Recognising the opportunity for higher revenues, the theatres enlarged their auditoriums from the 1790s onwards. However, this altered the familiar atmosphere. Attending a performance no longer felt like a guaranteed way of commanding full attention in public. The larger auditoriums meant that new people, largely unknown to existing subscribers, were flooding into theatres. Increasing industrialisation had resulted in the emergence of a wealthy bourgeois upper class with its own power structures and sense of power. This class sought entry into what had previously been an exclusive high-society circle, and had the financial means to pay in advance for weekly opera visits, either directly or through personal connections. An increasing number of prospective patrons were bypassing the subscription system in order to secure a box seat, and the black market was booming. Booksellers were even offering tickets for privately owned boxes, since a third of the aristocracy could no longer afford the doubled admission prices due to mismanaging their estates and the inflation caused by war. These price rises led to repeated riots, known as the 'Old Price Riots'. The atmosphere at the opera became more public and impersonal. It became considerably more difficult to classify the audience according to their social standing, since wealthy members of the middle classes could afford more ostentatious attire and more expensive seats than impoverished noblemen. Later, and still before the turn of the 19th century, boxes were built on either side of the stage due to the ongoing high demand for opera house seats. Men with social or political ambitions were particularly keen to rent a seat here, as it allowed them to position themselves prominently as patrons of a performer or impresario. The upper classes tried in vain to maintain their previous influence and standing within the opera network. However, due to the increasing commercialisation of opera and the decline in the number of aristocratic spectators, the subscription system gradually lost its significance, and by the 1830s it had become obsolete. By 1850, aristocrats were still flocking to opera performances. However, the make-up of the audience had changed. While female patrons, society ladies, fashionable dandies and military officers continued to attend the opera, active politicians and mistresses were scarcely to be found on the subscription lists. ### The Transformation: The Opera Buffa In opera seria, with its tragic plots centred on aristocratic heroes, aristocratic opera-goers could easily see themselves reflected in the characters and identify with them. In contrast, opera buffa featured amusing, farcical plots and non-aristocratic heroes. While aristocrats were unable to identify with the heroes of opera buffa, the bourgeois audience was fascinated by them. Even beyond the turn of the 19^(th) century, opera buffa was held in low esteem and disparaged in reviews and music historiography. The King's Theatre was the London venue for opera buffa. Although it had been part of the programme since 1760, it did not become a permanent fixture until 1773\. The theatre's impresaria, Colomba Mattei, devised a clever, cost-effective programme that would serve as a model for later opera buffa programmes at other theatres. It featured a balanced variety of performances, with opera seria at weekends and opera buffa on weekdays. Mattei engaged well-known composers as resident artists who created arrangements and pasticci specifically for the theatre's singers. Foreign opera buffa performers, who had travelled from the European mainland, often took charge of organising the productions. They procured scores for instrumentalists and singers, liaised with the resident composer and librettist, and performed as singers themselves. In doing so, they drew on operas with which they were already familiar. Therefore, newly composed operas were rarely included in the programmes of London’s opera houses. It usually took ten to twenty years after their world premiere on the European mainland for operas to be performed in England. During the 1810s, Mozart's operas dominated the programme at the King's Theatre. ## Music in the Private Salon Towards the end of the 18th century, the music industry experienced a boom, aided by the invention of new machinery that made printing sheet music faster and cheaper. For 'connoisseurs' and 'enthusiasts' – contemporary terms for music-loving laypeople – sheet music would be engraved approximately one to two months after the premiere of an opera, concerto or symphony, provided it had been successful. Around 1800, a vocal score of an opera cost 10 shillings and 6 pence, a vocal score of an overture cost 6 shillings, and six sonatas cost 10 shillings and 6 pence. Several pages of a vocal score would appear weekly in some music journals as instalments for just 1s 6d or 2s 6d. Readers had to buy successive instalments until they had the complete work. However, the delay was worthwhile, as this method was often cheaper overall than buying the complete work. Orchestral works were arranged for a small number of instruments or for a solo instrument. The most popular genre of piano music in the late 18th century was the accompanied piano sonata. Thanks to improvements in manufacturing techniques, pianos became affordable to a far greater number of people from the end of the 18th century onwards. Arrangements of orchestral compositions, known as piano reductions, meant that people could play stage works on their own, singing along where appropriate, thus recreating concert and opera experiences on a small scale in the comfort of their own homes. Piano sonatas, in turn, were often written as teaching pieces for piano students. While guides to learning to play the flute or violin — the most popular instruments of the 18th century, played mainly by men — had already been available since the 18th century, from the beginning of the 19th century, English amateur musicians were also able to acquire such guides for playing the piano. As well as learning to play the piano, it was popular amongst the aristocracy to have their daughters taught to sing. Ideally, a daughter would be able to play the piano virtuously and sing beautifully. A daughter's musical ability could influence her family's social standing: a daughter with no musical talent would be difficult to marry off and would tarnish her family's reputation. Consequently, daughters were sometimes forced to learn these skills regardless of their ability. During his stay in London in 1824, Gioachino Rossini also worked as a singing teacher and subsequently complained that 'not even £100 per lesson could compensate for the torture I endured listening to those ladies whose voices creaked horribly'. Jane Austen criticised her contemporaries for the relentless training their children underwent. This kind of musical education turned young women into 'mechanical automata' — dogged robots devoid of feeling and sensitivity — who were driven by a discipline reminiscent of Prussian drills to learn to play music in order to conform to the aristocratic ideal, and thus to societal expectations. Jane Austen wrote about 'mechanical automata' from personal experience: she had practised the piano every morning since the age of thirteen and played for her family in the evenings. This ritual was commonplace. To demonstrate their daughters' musical skills to other members of their social class and position them for favourable marriage prospects, families would gather in their salons to make music when entertaining guests or sharing a meal. At such private and semi-public concerts, it was customary for two women to play an orchestral arrangement of the operas currently showing in London on the piano four-hands whilst a third played the harp, singing the libretto simultaneously. By the end of the 18th century, musical education, including learning to play an instrument and singing, was no longer the exclusive domain of London’s elite. The emerging upper middle classes had equal access to sheet music and educational materials thanks to music copyists. In 1798, Edgewood stated that female proficiency had become so commonplace that it could no longer be considered a distinguishing feature of a gentlewoman’s education. The origins of mid-19th-century upper middle class domestic music-making can be traced back to aristocratic theatres and salons. These semi-public gatherings preserved the aristocratic courtly tradition whilst taking place in a private setting – the drawing room – for invited guests. The upper-middle-class salon served as a retreat for cultivating humanist ideals, and the piano became a characteristic piece of furniture in this room. Even in wealthy or educated upper middle-class families, great effort was made to ensure their daughters received a musical education. Conversely, while a noble family might experience social decline, musical talent in a bourgeois daughter not only brought social prestige and the prospect of a favourable marriage, it also formed the basis for social advancement — particularly if an attractive dowry was secured. Amédée Pichot described a typical scene in a salon: ‘Enter one of our coffee-rooms, and you will probably find two Englishmen seated silently in a corner, instead of engaging in conversation with one another. If, by chance, one of them, casting aside some of the national reserve, should venture to ask his neighbour a question, the latter will adopt a grave expression and, at most, offer a dry, monosyllabic reply, for two talkative Englishmen seldom meet under the same roof.’ And Charles Grenville reported: ‘There is a great deal of coming and going, and eating and drinking, and a corresponding amount of noise, but little or no conversation, discussion, or easy, quiet exchange of ideas and opinions; there is no regular social circle of men of intellectual or literary calibre to ensure a steady flow of conversation, and which, if it existed, would draw strength and support from the light presence of occasional visitors, with whatever they might individually contribute, be it much or little. The reason for this is that the woman herself, who must set the tone for her own society and influence its character, is ignorant, vulgar and commonplace.’ The bourgeois salon was distinguished from the aristocratic salon by the fact that musical performances were listened to in silence and with full attention. Research cites three reasons for this shift towards silent listening. - Firstly, the London bourgeoisie adopted the idea from Parisian musical life. - Secondly, the rise of the new middle class, in conjunction with opera buffa and its non-aristocratic heroes, brought about the change. - Thirdly, changes to theatre auditoriums meant that audience members were less familiar with one another, resulting in a more formal atmosphere and less outgoing behaviour. Private conversations during the performance became less common, probably because they were perceived as more disruptive when surrounded by strangers. Consequently, the audience's focus on the performance itself grew stronger. The aristocracy eventually adopted this etiquette, which had initially been established by the emerging middle classes. Quiet listening became increasingly prevalent, even at public musical performances, due to the steadily growing number of middle-class opera-goers. In salons, both amateur and professional musicians performed to earn extra income. However, professional musicians took their cue from the social status of the salon hosts and sometimes waived their fee. Music salons also promoted young artists to help them reach a wider audience. These opportunities raised their profile, thus helping to further their careers. ## Conclusion The English music scene in the Georgian era was changing in every respect. The upper classes, who were enthusiastic about Handel's works and opera seria, had their desire for variety and novelty satisfied by alterations to well-known and popular musical works, which rarely corresponded to the original. Attending the opera also satisfied their craving for performance and self-expression. For many years, opera was almost like a family member, until several factors eroded this over the course of a few decades. Following the expansion of London’s opera house auditoriums, an ever-increasing number of middle-class people began attending opera performances as spectators. Having become wealthy and influential as a result of the Industrial Revolution, they were often able to purchase season tickets for an entire season of opera performances. Alternatively, a patron might provide them with a box seat that had previously belonged to a nobleman. These wealthy capitalists often possessed more than an impoverished nobleman. For upper-class audience members, the expansion of the auditorium and influx of new faces meant the traditional opera-going experience began to fade: they recognised fewer and fewer people and could no longer see everyone. Furthermore, unlike the middle classes, they could not identify with the new genre of opera buffa. The well-educated and arts-interested section of the emerging middle classes were rarely found amongst opera-goers. Instead, they performed opera arias on the piano or other instruments at home, forging connections with like-minded individuals. It was through these connections that a visit to the opera might be arranged, though this was not a frequent occurrence. However, families could gain prestige and influence by ensuring their daughters received a good musical education, thereby developing links with the gentry. ## Bibliography - Baer, Marc: Theatre and disorder in late Georgian London. Oxford 1992. - Blom, Eric: Musik in England. Hamburg \[1948\]. - Budde, Gunilla: Bluetezeit des Buergertums. Buergerlichkeit im 19\. Jahrhundert. Darmstadt 2009\. \[= The Golden Age of the Bourgeoisie. Bourgeois Life in the 19th Century\] - Caldwell, John: England. In: Ludwig Finscher (ed.): Die Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Volume 3S. Kassel, 2nd ed., 1995\. pp. 27–73. - Carr, Bruce: Theatre Music: 1800–1834\. In: Nicholas Temperley and Charles G. Manns (eds.): The Romantic Age. The Blackwell History of Music in Britain. Volume 5. - Dahlhaus, Carl: Brahms und die Idee der Kammermusik. In: Neue Zeitschrift für Musik. Mainz 1973\. pp. 559–563\. \[= Brahms and the Idea of Chamber Music\] - Darby, Rosemarie: The Music of the Roman Catholic Embassy Chapels in London 1765 to 1825\. Manchester 1984. - Drage, Sally: A Reappraisal of Provincial Church Music. In: David Wyn Jones (ed.): Music in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Aldershot 2000\. pp. 172–190. - Eibach, Joachim: Die Schubertiade. Buergerlichkeit, Hausmusik und das oeffentliche im Privaten, 2008\. In: Themenportal Europaeische Geschichte. \[= The Schubertiade. Bourgeois Culture, Domestic Music and the Public in the Private Sphere, 2008\. In: European History Thematic Portal.\] (No longer online accessible) - Faulstich, Werner: Die buergerliche Mediengesellschaft (1700-1830). Goettingen 2002 (= Geschichte der Medien). \[= The Bourgeois Media Society (1700–1830), History of the Media\] - Fiske, Roger: ‘Concert Music II \[1760–1800\]’. In: Henry D. Johnstone and Robert Fiske (eds.): The Eighteenth Century. The Blackwell History of Music in Britain. Vol. 4\. Oxford 1990\. pp. 205–260. - Fiske, Roger: English Theatre Music in the Eighteenth Century. London 1973. - Fiske, Roger: Music in Society. In: Henry D. Johnstone and Robert Fiske (eds.): The Eighteenth Century. The Blackwell History of Music in Britain. Volume 4\. Oxford 1990\. pp. 3–27. - Habermas, Juergen: Strukturwandel der Oeffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der buergerlichen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main 1990\. \[= The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Studies in a Category of Bourgeois Society\] - Hall-Witt, Jennifer: Fashionable Acts. Opera and Elite Culture in London 1780–1880\. Durham 2007. - Haskins, Robert: ‘Theatre Music II \[1760–1800\]’. In: Henry D. Johnstone and Robert Fiske (eds.): The Eighteenth Century. The Blackwell History of Music in Britain. Volume 4\. Oxford 1990\. pp. 261–312. - Holman, Peter: Eighteenth-Century English Music. Past, Present, Future. In: David Wyn Jones (ed.): Music in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Aldershot 2000\. 1–13. - Hurd, Michael: Glees, Madrigals, and Partsongs. In: Nicholas Temperley and Charles G. Manns (eds.): The Romantic Age. The Blackwell History of Music in Britain. Vol. 5\. Oxford 1988\. pp. 242–265. - Jungmann, Irmgard: Sozialgeschichte der klassischen Musik. Bildungsbuergerliche Musikanschauung im 19\. und 20\. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart 2008\. \[= A Social History of Classical Music. The Musical Outlook of the Educated Middle Classes in the 19th and 20th Centuries\] - Kendall, Alan: Gioacchino Rossini. The Reluctant Hero. London 1992. - Krieg, Gustav A.: Einfuehrung in die anglikanische Kirchenmusik.. Cologne 2007\. \[= An Introduction to Anglican Church Music\] - Long, Kenneth R.: The Music of the English Church. New York 1972. - McVeigh, Simon: ‘Freemasonry and Musical Life in London in the Late Eighteenth Century’. In: David Wyn Jones (ed.): Music in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Aldershot 2000\. 72–100. - Mohn, Barbara: Das englische Oratorium im 19\. Jahrhundert. Quellen, Traditionen, Paderborn (et al.) 2000 (= Beitraege zur Kirchenmusik 9). \[= The English Oratorio in the 19th Century.\] - Nicoll, Allardyce: A History of Early Eighteenth-Century Drama 1700–1750\. Cambridge 1925. - Olleson, Philip (ed.): The Letters of Samuel Wesley. Professional and Social Correspondence 1797–1837\. Oxford 2001. - Olleson, Philip: The London Roman Catholic Embassy Chapels and their Music in the Eighteenth Centuries. In: David Wyn Jones (ed.): Music in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Aldershot 2000\. 101–118. - Perkin, Harold: The Origins of Modern English Society 1780–1880\. London 1969. - Petrat, Nicolai: Hausmusik des Biedermeier im Blickpunkt der zeitgenössischen musikalischen Fachpresse (1815-1848). Hamburg 1986\. (= Hamburger Beitraege zur Musikwissenschaft 31) \[= Biedermeier Domestic Music in the Spotlight of the Contemporary Music Press\] - Philip, Robert: London. In: Stanley Sadie (ed.): New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians. Volume 15\. London, 2nd ed., 2001\. pp. 91–167. - Range, Matthias: William Boyce’s Anthem for the Wedding of King George III. In: Musical Times 147 (2006). pp. 59–66. - Reimer, Erich: ‘Hausmusik’. In: Concise Dictionary of Musical Terminology (5th edition). Mainz 1977. - Rohr, Deborah: The Careers of British Musicians. A Profession of Artisans. Cambridge 2001. - Sadie, Stanley: ‘Music in the Home II \[1760–1800\]’. In: Henry D. Johnstone and Robert Fiske (eds.): The Eighteenth Century: The Blackwell History of Music in Britain. Vol. 4\. Oxford 1990\. pp. 313–354. - Searle, Arthur: London. In: Ludwig Finscher (ed.): Music in History and the Present. Volume 5S. Kassel, 2nd ed., 1996\. pp. 1455–1475. - Temperley, Nicholas: ‘Music in Chur’. In: Robert Fiske (ed.): Music in Britain. The Eighteenth Century. Oxford 1990\. pp. 357–396. - Weber, William: ‘Did People Listen in the 18th Century?’ In: Early Music 25 (1997). pp. 678–681. - Willaert, Saskia: ‘Italian Opera at the King’s Theatre in the 1760s: The Role of the Buffi’. In: David Wyn Jones (ed.): Music in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Aldershot 2000\. pp. 17–35. - Wood, Gillen D’Arcy: Romanticism and Music Culture in Britain 1770–1840\. Virtue and Virtuosity. New York 2010. - Woodfield, Ian: Opera and Drama in Eighteenth-Century London. The King’s Theatre, Garrick and the Business of Performance. Cambridge 2001\. (= Cambridge Studies in Opera) - Zoellner, Eva: English Oratorio after Handel. The London Oratorio Series and its Repertory 1760–1800\. Marburg 2002.